Lifting The Veil

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), commonly known as the Mormon Church, teaches that after a temple endowment ceremony, faithful members must wear special undergarments—known as temple garments—daily. These garments are considered sacred and symbolic, reminding wearers of the covenants they've made and offering spiritual protection. However, while these may be meaningful within the LDS context, they do not align with biblical Christianity. Nowhere in the New Testament does God command His people to wear religious clothing as a sign of spiritual standing. In fact, the New Testament radically shifts the focus from outward religious symbols to inward transformation. Paul writes in Romans 14:17 (NLT), “For the Kingdom of God is not a matter of what we eat or drink [or wear], but of living a life of goodness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.” In the Old Testament, under the Mosaic Covenant, priests did wear symbolic garments (see Exodus 28). But even those were s...

Mormon doctrine doesn’t reflect the heart, character, or justice of the true God of the Bible. The idea that God is a polygamist with multiple wives—and that women are eternally bound to men in a hierarchy where they have no equal standing or freedom—is not just troubling. It’s completely foreign to the gospel of Jesus Christ. The Bible teaches that there is one God (Deuteronomy 6:4), and He is not an exalted man with celestial wives. He is eternal, unchanging, holy, and complete in Himself (Malachi 3:6; Isaiah 44:6). Nowhere in Scripture do we see God portrayed as a polygamist. In fact, biblical marriage consistently points to one man and one woman in covenant love, reflecting Christ’s love for His Church (Ephesians 5:31–32). That’s the true pattern—not Joseph Smith’s manipulative vision of celestial polygamy. You're absolutely right—Doctrine & Covenants 132, which lays out eternal polygamy, has never been renounced. It’s still canonized LDS scripture. And leaders like Nelson ...

In a time when spiritual deception is celebrated as “tolerance,” and every religious voice is given equal footing, it has never been more important for Christians to draw a clear line between the truth of God’s Word and the counterfeit gospels that lead to eternal destruction. Recently, I came across the story of a man whose grandfather was both a 33rd Degree Freemason and a lifelong deacon in a Baptist church. After his grandfather’s death, the man inherited books such as Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike and Mackey’s Encyclopedia of Freemasonry. The disturbing contents of those volumes left him with a painful conclusion: his grandfather either lied to the Masons or lied to the church. He could not have faithfully belonged to both. That dilemma exposes a deeper truth—one that also applies to another institution masquerading as Christian: the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), commonly known as Mormonism. The similarities between Freemasonry and Mormonism are not coincide...

The attempt to defend the LDS priesthood ban and slavery under Brigham Young by comparing them to biblical laws or suggesting they were “benevolent” misses the profound moral failures involved and falls far short of true Christian repentance and accountability. Christians must reject any justification that minimizes sin or excuses systemic injustice, no matter the era or context. First, the claim that LDS leaders have no reason to apologize for blocking Black men from the priesthood because Christian churches do not apologize for failures related to biblical commands misunderstands the gospel entirely. Jesus’ law is one of love, repentance, and restoration. When the church or its leaders sin, true Christian humility calls for confession, repentance, and seeking forgiveness. Silence or deflection is not godly. Christ’s example was to take responsibility for sin and call others to repentance, even when it was unpopular (John 8:11; 1 John 1:9). Second, the priesthood ban was a clear injus...

In recent years, many have been drawn in by the friendly, family-oriented appeal of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. But beneath the polished image and wholesome branding lies a theology that strikes at the very heart of biblical truth—starting with the outrageous claim that Jesus Christ and Lucifer are spirit brothers. This isn’t a fringe belief. It’s fundamental LDS doctrine: that God the Father created both Jesus and Lucifer as His spirit children in a premortal realm. Jesus chose obedience and became the Savior; Lucifer rebelled and became Satan. On the surface, this may sound like a dramatic morality tale of agency and consequence. But in reality, it’s a theological train wreck—and a direct assault on the gospel of Jesus Christ. The Bible tells us plainly that Jesus is not a created being. He is eternal. “In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1, NLT). He didn’t become God—He is God. Co-eternal with the Fathe...

The Bible makes it clear from the very first pages: God created life by His word, not by a long, uncertain process. Genesis 1 doesn't describe a gradual unfolding of life through natural laws—it describes God speaking, and creation obeying. That is not compatible with evolutionary theory, whether dressed up in science or Mormon scripture. The LDS claim that “the Gods” organized life over time undermines both the authority of Scripture and the nature of God Himself. There is one God—not many—and He did not need evolution to form the world. He created instantly, fully, and purposefully. The Bible says, “By the word of the Lord the heavens were made… For He spoke, and it came to be” (Psalm 33:6, 9). God did not evolve man from lesser creatures. He formed man from the dust and breathed life into him. Humans are not upgraded animals—we are the image-bearers of God. That’s not an interpretation. It’s what the Bible plainly says. To argue that “we don’t know” how man was made, or that it ...

To justify the racist priesthood ban in the LDS Church by appealing to the Levitical priesthood or the hardness of men's hearts is not only theologically flawed—it is a direct insult to the nature and character of God, who shows no partiality (Acts 10:34–35). The argument attempts to whitewash decades of racial discrimination under the banner of supposed divine patience, while ignoring the unbiblical foundations of the ban altogether. The Levitical priesthood, as outlined in the Old Testament, was never based on race. It was based on tribal assignment, not skin color. And even then, it was part of a temporary covenant fulfilled in Christ (Hebrews 7:11–12). Once Jesus inaugurated the New Covenant, the priesthood was made spiritually accessible to all who are in Him—male, female, Jew, Gentile, Black, or white (Galatians 3:28). To compare this to the LDS priesthood ban, which was based on race, is to misapply the biblical text in a dangerous way. Jesus never established or endorsed an...